ArticleEcancermedicalscience2026
A study of clinical profile and outcomes of paediatric patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical and socio-demographic profile, as well as the induction outcomes, of paediatric patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients up to 18 years of age who presented between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021. Patients with a diagnosis of de novo AML confirmed by flow cytometry, or with extra-medullary soft tissue masses proven to be AML by immunohistochemistry, were included. All records were obtained from the Paediatric Oncology database and supplemented by treatment files. Results: Among 56 patients analyzed, the male-to-female ratio was 1.15. The median age was 7 years (range: 0.2-18 years). The white blood cell (WBC) count at presentation ranged from 1,250/μL to 296,000/μL (median: 29,000/μL). Sixty percent of patients were malnourished, and the majority belonged to lower socioeconomic strata. Fever was the most common presenting symptom (93%), followed by bleeding (61%), easy fatigability (53%), bone pain (46%), hepatosplenomegaly (39%) and lymphadenopathy (14%). According to European LeukaemiaNet (ELN) 2017 risk stratification, 52% of patients were categorized as favourable risk, 18% as intermediate risk and 28% as high risk; one patient could not be risk-stratified. Remission was achieved in 47% of patients, 23% did not achieve remission, 16% died during induction and 14% abandoned treatment. Conclusion: Demographic variables, nutritional status, WBC count and clinical presentations were not associated with induction outcomes, possibly due to the availability of extensive supportive care services such as accommodation near the hospital, free food and treatment and psychosocial support in the paediatric oncology unit. In contrast, ELN risk categories were strongly associated with outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.