SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Systematic review of different approaches for performance enhancement in elite sport.
Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elite sport is undergoing rapid technological transformation driven by advanced analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), and immersive systems. While numerous studies address performance enhancement and injury-related applications, evidence remains fragmented across technologies and sport contexts. Objective: This systematic review aimed to examine the prevalence and distribution of advanced analytical technologies across application domains (performance, injury, and emerging objectives) and sport disciplines, and to identify areas of technological maturity in elite sport. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Four databases (Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore) were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2019 and March 2025. Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and were synthesised using a structured qualitative approach. Results: AI-based methods dominated the literature (32/52 studies, 61.5%), including machine learning (15.4%), deep learning (9.6%), generative AI (17.3%), and hybrid approaches (19.2%). Statistical modelling accounted for 23.1% of studies, while virtual reality represented 15.4%. Performance enhancement was the primary objective (52%), followed by injury-related outcomes (27%) and emerging applications such as tactical analysis and decision support (21%). Team sports, particularly football, demonstrated the highest level of technological maturity. Conclusion: Advanced analytical technologies are unevenly distributed across sport disciplines and objectives, with clear maturity in performance-focused team sport applications. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for researchers and practitioners seeking to prioritise effective and context-appropriate technological adoption in elite sport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.