ReviewBMJ neurology open2026
Neurological implications of chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy.
Review in BMJ neurology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have transformed the management of relapsed or refractory haematological malignancies and are now being adapted for severe B-cell mediated autoimmune disease, including neuroimmunological disorders. Their appeal lies in deep and durable B-cell depletion within lymphoid tissues and target organs, with the potential to induce long-lasting, treatment-free remission. At the same time, broader application is constrained by serious toxicities, in particular, neurological complications such as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and more recently recognised movement, cerebellar, cranial nerve and peripheral nerve syndromes. In this review, we outline the biological principles of CAR-T cell therapy and summarise the emerging experience in neuroimmunology. We draw on data from both oncology and early autoimmune trials to describe the clinical spectrum, timing and proposed mechanisms of CAR-T cell-related neurotoxicity and to distinguish ICANS from later and more focal toxicities. As CAR-T cell therapies move from cancer centres into the care of patients with refractory neuroimmunological disease, neurologists will need a detailed understanding of both their therapeutic promise and their neurological risks, and close collaboration within multidisciplinary teams will be essential to deliver these treatments safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.