ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
Hip exoskeleton assistance with machine-learning-based state estimation improves gait kinematics of people with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exoskeleton assistance has the potential to address many gait related symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, gait variability, a hallmark of PD, makes designing exoskeleton controllers uniquely challenging. We sought to overcome the challenges that gait variability in PD poses for state estimation by employing machine-learning models for gait-phase estimation within our exoskeleton controller. Using machine-learning-based gait-phase models deployed on a hip exoskeleton (N = 7), we performed a 2-day protocol for people with PD where the first day focused on acclimation to the device and the second focused on evaluating the device by collecting gait metrics. Using 2-min walking tests, we assessed the impact of two different types of fixed torque assistance profiles on spatiotemporal and kinematic gait metrics. We demonstrated significant improvements to hip range-of-motion (8.4%), swing time (4.7%), and peak toe clearance (12.3%) in people with PD when walking with a combined flexion and extension assistance profile as compared to walking without an exoskeleton. Although we saw trends, there were no significant differences from providing only flexion assistance given our sample size. We also demonstrated that participant-specific models reduced gait-phase estimation error by 40%, however, resulting gait metrics were not significantly altered compared to metrics when walking with the generic model. These results demonstrate that ML gait-phase-based control approaches with limited PD-specific data can improve PD gait kinematics, with enhanced accuracy associated with participant-specific data. Ultimately, these results contribute to the goal of assistive exoskeletons in everyday use for people with Parkinson's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.