ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Mapping meanings: methodological innovations to restore memories of place in a public park in Santiago de Chile.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In its conventional conception, the map has been defined as a "map-instrument," that is, as a technical device of an informative-practical nature. However, from the perspective of critical cartography, representation is understood rather as a spatial discourse, capable of "producing" political images of the territory and integrating subjectivity as one of its constitutive elements. In parallel, environmental psychology has long examined how people construct places through their interactions with and modifications of their environment, thereby linking places to meanings and to personal and collective experiences. Traditional approaches within this field have increasingly been questioned for their apolitical and uncritical assumptions, underscoring the need to recognize that the person-place relationships emerge from the interaction of personal, social, and political-contextual dimensions. This critique resonates with challenges posed by critical cartography to positivist approaches to map production, emphasizing how individuals and groups actively construct their social and spatial reality. This paper builds on data produced as part of a study conducted in Quebrada de Macul Park in Santiago de Chile, with the aim of developing a novel methodological approach to the study of place-assemblages. Place-assemblages are understood here as an ontological concept for examining analytical entities that intertwine material, symbolic, and practical dimensions of people-place relationships. Our guiding research question is: (How) Can subjective and/or psychosocial processes embedded in people-place relations be cartographically represented? To address this question we conducted (i) a systematic literature review to synthesize recent publications that integrate psychosocial and/or narrative processes with cartographic representations, and (ii) a reflexive thematic analysis of two in-depth interviews from the original study aimed at understanding how narratives might produce diverse multi-layer cartographies through which place is conceived as socially and politically intertwined. In doing so, the paper aims to advance methodological strategies, as well as onto-epistemological discussions, on how to operationalize the ontology of 'place-assemblages', translating this conceptual proposal into a concrete framework for capturing the symbolic, material, and practical nature of the person-place's unity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.