Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877615›Full record

ReviewClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Discrepant Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Trials in Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation after Stroke: Insights from NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESIA.

Heng Liu, Zhangbin Li, Xiaoqing Chen, Junjie Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heng LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Heyuan People's Hospital, Heyuan, China.
Zhangbin LiDepartment of Cardiology, Heyuan People's Hospital, Heyuan, China.
Xiaoqing ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Heyuan People's Hospital, The First Clinical College of Guangdong Medical University, Heyuan, China.
Junjie ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Heyuan People's Hospital, Heyuan, China.ORCID 0009-0001-7837-071X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of device-detected atrial fibrillation in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack remains a clinical dilemma, balancing the potential benefits of stroke prevention against the risks of anticoagulant-related bleeding. This review synthesizes evidence from the NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESIA trials, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in this population. Collectively, randomized evidence regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack remains limited and internally discordant. In ARTESIA, apixaban was associated with a reduction in ischemic stroke accompanied by an increase in major bleeding, yielding a relatively coherent benefit-risk signal in this high-risk subgroup. In contrast, NOAH-AFNET 6 demonstrated a modest and statistically non-significant reduction in ischemic stroke alongside a substantial increase in major bleeding. Further research is still needed to refine patient selection and optimize therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationStrokeAdministration, OralHumansTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsDevice-detected atrial fibrillationdirect oral anticoagulantsoutcomesstroke preventionsubclinical atrial fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID41877615
PMCPMC13018698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.