Observational studyHematological oncology2026
Clinical Outcomes of Ruxolitinib Treatment in Patients With IPSS Intermediate-1-Risk Myelofibrosis: Interim Analysis From an Italian, Prospective Study (ROMEI).
Observational study in Hematological oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
56 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ruxolitinib (RUX), a JAK1/2 inhibitor, demonstrated treatment benefits for myelofibrosis (MF) in intermediate-1 (Int-1)-risk patients with a significant disease burden; however, the evidence is scarce. This interim analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with Int-1-risk MF. ROMEI, a multicenter, observational, prospective study, enrolled 508 adult patients with MF receiving ruxolitinib according to approved indications. The present interim analysis was focused on 107 eligible patients in the Int-1-risk group. Primary endpoints included changes in symptoms response and health-related quality of life scores. Secondary endpoints included spleen response evaluation, overall survival, and safety including dosing pattern and dose interruptions. Among the 107 Int-1-risk patients with a median age of 63 years, 65.5% were highly symptomatic (total symptoms score: ≥ 20), while the spleen was palpable at ≥ 5 cm and ≥ 10 cm in 74% and 27% of patients, respectively, with baseline EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) score of 65.1 ± 19.4. After RUX treatment, 42.1% and 43.9% of patients demonstrated a symptom response at 24 and 48 weeks, while 38.9% and 46.8% showed a spleen response at 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. EQ-VAS increased to 71.8 ± 16.3 at 24 weeks and 69.3 ± 19.2 at 48 weeks. Furthermore, 11.2% and 25.2% of patients reported temporary and permanent discontinuation, respectively with no new adverse events reported. The interim analysis showed that ruxolitinib provided clinical benefits, a manageable safety profile, and improved quality of life for Int-1-risk subgroup patients with frequent and sustained responses with acceptable toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.