ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2026
Features affecting Cas9-induced editing efficiency and patterns in tomato: evidence from a large CRISPR dataset.
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Imprecise Cas12a/ssODN-Mediated Editing of eIF4E1 Confers Dominant-Negative Resistance to Potato Virus Y in Solanum tuberosum.Molecular plant pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9 is a cornerstone of plant genome editing, yet the determinants of editing efficiency for a given single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) and DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair outcomes remain poorly understood, particularly in plants. Here, we generated a large experimental dataset comprising 420 sgRNAs targeting promoters, exons, and introns of 137 genes in tomato protoplasts, and quantified editing efficiency and repair footprints together with chromatin accessibility and transcriptional state in the same cellular context. Editing efficiency was consistently higher at targets in accessible chromatin and modestly higher in promoters and introns than in exons, whereas transcriptional activity had no detectable effect. Editing efficiencies were more similar among sgRNAs targeting the same gene than among different genes, revealing a local genomic influence on Cas9 activity. A distinct subset of sgRNAs achieved near-complete editing and produced characteristic repair footprints dominated by long deletions with extended microhomology tracts, indicative of microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), resembling patterns associated with high-efficiency guides in human cells, and suggesting conserved sequence-driven repair biases across species. In contrast, widely used human-trained prediction models failed to accurately rank sgRNA performance in plants, highlighting the limits of cross-species predictability. Together, this dataset provides a resource for improving guide design and mechanistic understanding of plant DNA repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.