ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026
Risdiplam Impact in Treatment Naïve and Non-Naïve Pediatric and Adult Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRisdiplam, an oral disease-modifying therapy, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in clinical trials, but real-world data from Asia are limited.
methodsThis prospective study followed 34 symptomatic SMA patients (24 adults, 10 children) over 36 months of risdiplam treatment. The cohort included 5 patients with SMA type 1, 25 with SMA type 2, and 4 with SMA type 3, with ages ranging from 6.9 to 50.9 years. Most (91%) were wheelchair users, and 74% had scoliosis managed by bracing or spinal surgery. Twenty-five patients (22 adults, 3 children) were treatment naïve, and 9 patients (2 adults, 7 children) switched from nusinersen. Motor function was assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months using MFM-32, RULM, ATEND, and HFMSE. In pediatric patients, HRQOL was evaluated using PedsQL Neuromuscular Module and PedsQL Generic Core scale. HRQOL of their parents was assessed with PedsQL Family Impact Module.
resultsAfter 36 months, MFM-32 score was significantly improved in those switching therapies [p = 0.042], while both MFM-32 and RULM scores were significantly improved in treatment-naïve group [p = 0.005 and p = 0.043]. Parents experienced HRQOL gains in their Physical domain (2 years: PedsQL Family Impact Module, p = 0.038). Pediatric patients showed improvement in the Communication domain (3 years: PedsQL Neuromuscular Module, p = 0.042). Risdiplam was generally well tolerated; however, two adults discontinued due to adverse effects. Moreover, two adult patients died during treatment.
conclusionsThis study fills Asian real-world data gaps, stresses the importance in monitoring in severe SMA, and underscores the need for larger, long-term safety and efficacy studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.