ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Waist-to-Height Ratio and the Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes With and Without Abdominal Obesity.
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Risk Profiling in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Machine Learning-Assisted Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimWaist-to-height ratio (WHtR) has been suggested as a superior marker of cardiometabolic risk compared to waist circumference (WC), but evidence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains limited. MATERIALS AND
methodsA population-based cohort of 2 076 104 patients with T2DM who underwent the Korean national health checkup between 2015 and 2016 were followed until 2022. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to analyse the association between WHtR and the risk of incident myocardial infarction, stroke and mortality. Restricted cubic spline analyses were performed to evaluate continuous dose-response relationships, with additional stratification by abdominal obesity.
resultsDuring follow-up, 125 493 deaths (6.0%), 56 280 myocardial infarctions (2.7%) and 62 938 strokes (3.0%) occurred. WHtR showed increasing association with the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, and a U-shaped association with all-cause mortality. Individuals with both abdominal obesity and WHtR ≥ 0.5 had higher risks of myocardial infarction (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.17), stroke (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.15-1.21) and mortality (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.16-1.25). In those without abdominal obesity, WHtR ≥ 0.5 was also associated with increased cardiovascular risks but slightly lower mortality. In contrast, those with abdominal obesity but normal WHtR had no significantly increased risks for any outcomes. The associations were stronger in younger adults and individuals with new-onset T2DM for cardiovascular outcomes, and in those with long-standing T2DM for mortality.
conclusionsWHtR was independently associated with cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in individuals with T2DM, including those without abdominal obesity. This simple measurement may provide additional information beyond WC for evaluating cardiometabolic risk in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.