Observational studyCancer medicine2026
Qualitative Study of Breast Cancer and Lymphoma Patients Participating in a Physical Activity Intervention: The Case for Tailored Physical Activity.
Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01719562 (Improving Exercise Capacity With a Tailored Physical Activity Intervention in Lymphoma and Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment - An Addendum to NIH R01CA167821 "Early Imaging Detection of Cardiovascular Injury After Cancer"), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Exercise Capacity With a Tailored Physical Activity Intervention in Lymphoma and Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment - An Addendum to NIH R01CA167821 "Early Imaging Detection of Cardiovascular Injury After Cancer"
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExercise mitigates chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity, but implementing exercise interventions during chemotherapy treatment can be challenging. Understanding the patient perspective can help refine exercise programs and facilitate successful implementation of future interventions. PURPOSE: To utilize qualitative data to optimize adherence and retention for a future randomized clinical trial involving a tailored physical activity (PA) intervention among breast cancer and lymphoma patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy.
methodsEighteen breast cancer and lymphoma patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy who enrolled in a PA intervention completed semi-structured interviews. Interviews focused on reasons for enrollment or dropout, perceptions of study personnel, experiences within the study interventions, and barriers to intervention adherence. Interviews were audio recorded. Key points and potential themes were identified using an integrative synthesis of the data.
resultsParticipants were on average 53 years (SD = 15) old, were 50% female (n = 9), predominantly identified as White (n = 15, 83%), and were mostly non-Hodgkin Lymphoma patients (n = 11, 61%). The main reasons for enrollment were altruism and provider recommendation. Participants stated they completed the study because of intrinsic motivation, ease of participation, and positive study experiences. Participants reported favorable perceptions of the study interventions and study staff. Barriers to adherence included symptom burden and lack of motivation.
conclusionsMessages to enhance altruism and collaboration with providers may be important recruitment tools. Developing positive study-staff relationships and delivering tailored, flexible interventions may enhance study adherence and retention. Ultimately, these strategies contribute to the successful implementation of cancer exercise trials. TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01719562.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.