Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877329›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Bayesian randomised controlled trial of guided parent-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for children with anxiety disorders via remote sessions in Japan: a study protocol.

Sho Okawa, Simon E Blackwell, Mara Violato, Cathy Creswell, Shin-Ichi Ishikawa, Erika Obikane, Takahito Takahashi, Honami Arai, Hideki Nakamura, Kazue Ishitsuka and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sho OkawaDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan sokawa@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8428-5960
Simon E BlackwellDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Institute of Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Mara ViolatoNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cathy CreswellDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Shin-Ichi IshikawaFaculty of Psychology, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.
Erika ObikaneDepartment of Social Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahito TakahashiFaculty of Education, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Honami AraiCenter for Research on Counseling and Support Services, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki NakamuraResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Kazue IshitsukaDivision of Lifecourse Epidemiology, Integrated Center for Women's Health, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiji ShimizuResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6741-9338
Tsuyoshi SasakiDepartment of Child Psychiatry, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGuided parent-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (GPD-CBT) is an evidence-based, low-burden treatment programme for childhood anxiety disorders with demonstrated efficacy, cost-effectiveness and accessibility. However, it has been tested primarily in Western countries, and the efficacy and cost-effectiveness have not been evaluated in Japanese families. The current study aims to examine GPD-CBT's efficacy and cost-effectiveness in Japanese samples and explore potential cultural adaptations of the programme. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This study is designed as a Bayesian single-blind randomised controlled trial with two parallel groups: GPD-CBT (intervention group) and a waitlist control group. The primary outcome is remission of primary anxiety disorders evaluated through diagnostic interviews by independent evaluators. Secondary outcomes include child and parent-reported child anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms and life interference. Additionally, measures of parental psychological characteristics, programme acceptability and quality of life are collected. We will conduct qualitative interviews with parents who participated in the programme and therapists who delivered the intervention to explore potential cultural adaptations. We aim to recruit 54-170 families, depending on the results of sequential Bayesian analyses. GPD-CBT consists of seven weekly 20 min sessions and a 1-month follow-up session. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 13 weeks post randomisation (primary endpoint for between-group comparison), with an additional 25 weeks post randomisation. The waitlist control group will receive GPD-CBT after the 13-week assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Committees of Chiba University and the University of Tokyo. We will disseminate results through academic conference presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications. If the GPD-CBT intervention proves efficacious, we will promote wider implementation in Japan through the development of training programmes for mental health professionals and key stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: jRCT1032250421 (https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1032250421) and jRCT1030250422 (https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1030250422) registered on 9 October 2025.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyParentsBayes TheoremChildCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansJapanMaleMental Health TeletherapyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodAnxiety disordersChild & adolescent psychiatryPsychosocial Intervention

Identifiers

PMID41877329
PMCPMC13034266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.