Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877326›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Machine learning for medication error detection: a scoping review protocol.

Félicien Hêche, Anthony Yazdani, Sohrab Ferdowsi, Ryme Kabak, Gang Mu, Douglas Teodoro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Félicien HêcheDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland felicien.heche@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3425-8189
Anthony YazdaniDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sohrab FerdowsiDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ryme KabakJohnson & Johnson, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Gang MuJohnson & Johnson, Zug, Switzerland.
Douglas TeodoroDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedication errors pose a significant threat to public health. Despite efforts by health agencies and the implementation of various interventions, such as staff training, medication reconciliation and automation, the persistence of these incidents highlights the need for more effective, scalable solutions. In recent years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising approach in healthcare, offering potential to detect and predict medication errors through data-driven insights. This scoping review aims to systematically map the existing literature on ML-based approaches to predict or detect medication errors across all stages of the medication use process. The review seeks to identify the range of ML applications in this domain, characterise methodological trends and highlight current knowledge gaps. The findings will provide a structured and accessible overview for both clinicians and researchers, supporting the development of safer, more data-informed medication practices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Structured searches will be performed in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, covering publications from 1 January 2015 to 28 April 2025. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used to identify eligible studies. Key information-including ML models, data sources and type, evaluation methods and clinical contexts-will be extracted and analysed using descriptive statistics, visualisations, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study involves a review of existing literature and does not involve human participants, personal data or unpublished secondary data. As such, ethical approval was not required. All data analysed were obtained from publicly available sources. Findings of the scoping review will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publications in scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/38SFY).

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedication ErrorsHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicArtificial IntelligenceClinical Decision-MakingHealth informaticsHealth & safetyMachine LearningRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID41877326
PMCPMC13034222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.