ArticleBMJ open2026
Geographic barriers to gynaecological cancer care in Indonesia: a geospatial and infrastructure analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-grade serous ovarian cancer in Indonesia: Insights from the largest multicenter cohort in a middle-income country.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify underserved regions and evaluate the population coverage based on travel time and distance to hospitals with gynaecologic oncologists in Indonesia.
methodsThe travel time and distance to hospitals with gynaecologic oncologists were evaluated using the Quantum Geographic Information System. Data from 139 gynaecologic oncologists and their affiliated hospitals were obtained from the Indonesian Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (November 2024) and cross-referenced with the Ministry of Health records. The female population density data were sourced from Facebook's high-resolution settlement layer. Isochrones were generated to estimate travel times and distances using zonal statistics, which facilitated the calculation of population coverage.
resultsA total of 139 gynaecologic oncologists were identified nationwide, practising in 243 hospitals (7.6% of the 3202 hospitals in Indonesia), with a concentration in Java (60.4%). 11 of the 38 provinces lack sub-specialists. Population coverage varies sharply: the travel time to a hospital with gynaecologic oncologists is ≤2 hours for 79.1% of women in Java, compared with 4.9% in Papua; overall, 34.4% reside more than 100 km away from hospitals with gynaecologic oncologists. Hospitals with gynaecologic oncologists are predominantly urban class B general hospitals, and 83.1% participate in the National Health Insurance Schemes. Exploratory district-level correlations showed positive associations between the number of such hospitals and total female population (r=0.44, p<0.001), female life expectancy (r=0.29, p<0.001), per-capita expenditure (r=0.54, p<0.001), female population density (r=0.68, p<0.001), female Human Development Index (r=0.4, p<0.001) and a negative association with land area size (r=-0.15, p<0.001).
conclusionsGynaecological oncology services in Indonesia remain heavily concentrated in Java, leaving nearly one-fifth of women residing more than 100 km away. The travel time is greater than 2 hours for many. Targeted expansion of the gynaecologic oncologists workforce, diagnostic and treatment infrastructure, and sustainable financing mechanisms are required to close these gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.