ArticleJournal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery2026
The safety and efficacy of anti-thrombotic agents during mechanical thrombectomy procedure for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Ischemic stroke, primarily driven by large-vessel atherosclerosis, is frequently treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). While anti-thrombotic agents during MT procedure are commonly used, their risk-benefit profile remains unclear. This study compares the safety and efficacy of anti-thrombotic administration in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing MT. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar for studies evaluating anti-thrombotic use during MT. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (Web Version). We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for safety outcomes (sICH and 3- to 6-month mortality) and efficacy outcomes (successful recanalization and functional independence). Results: Thirteen observational studies (n=4,923) were included. Anti-thrombotic use did not significantly alter the risk of sICH [OR 0.83 (95% CI 0.63-1.1); p=0.21; I2=25%]. However, it was associated with reduced 3-6-month mortality [OR 0.57 (95% CI 0.33-0.99); p=0.05; I2=86%], though heterogeneity was high. Regarding efficacy, anti-thrombotic use showed no significant association with successful recanalization [OR 1.22 (95% CI 0.81-1.83); p=0.63; I2=74%] or functional independence [OR 1.07 (95% CI 0.81-1.41); p=0.31; I2=73%]. Conclusions: Administration of anti-thrombotic agents during MT may reduce 3- to 6-month mortality without increasing sICH risk. However, they do not appear to significantly improve recanalization rates or functional independence. Given the high heterogeneity in mortality data, these results should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.