ArticlePneumonia (Nathan Qld.)2026
Prognosis of clinical pneumonia in undernourished children in rural Gambia.
Article in Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUndernutrition significantly increases the risk of severe infections and mortality in children under five, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Pneumonia, a leading cause of childhood death, is especially dangerous in undernourished children, yet prognostic measures to identify those at highest risk are lacking.
objectiveTo identify algorithms of poor prognosis in undernourished children with clinical pneumonia for early identification of children at risk for poor outcomes.
methodsThis study analyzed a subset of children enrolled in a cohort designed to identify biomarkers of bacterial pneumonia. Children aged 2–59 months with clinical pneumonia were recruited from two rural Gambian hospitals. Clinical and anthropometric data were collected at baseline, during hospitalization, and at 30-day follow-up. Nutritional status was classified using WHO definitions for stunting (height-for-age Z-scores) and wasting (weight-for-height Z-scores) as severe (Z-scores ≤ -3), moderate (-2 ≥ Z-scores > -3), and mild (-1 ≥ Z-scores > -2). Prognostic outcomes were classified into good and poor. Poor prognosis included death, prolonged hospital stay (≥ 7 days), post-discharge care-seeking, and difficult to feed during admission. Good prognosis was based on a hospital stay < 3 days, with good outcomes within 30 days of the initial visit. Classification tree models and penalized logistic regression models (fit through elastic net) were used to identify combinations of predictors of poor prognosis (prognostic signatures).
resultsA total of 246 children with clinical pneumonia and undernutrition (wasting or stunting) were included. Children with poor prognosis presented more frequently with respiratory distress, hypoxemia, reduced capacity oforal feeding difficulty, and anemia. As expected, undernutrition was associated with adverse outcomes. The final prognostic algorithms were accurate to identify undernourished children at risk of poor prognosis: with sensitivity and specificity > 80% and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥ 0.80. Furthermore, we identified accurate prognostic signatures among children with both wasting and stunting.
conclusionMeasures collected at admission in undernourished children with clinical pneumonia can identify those at risk of poor outcomes. The prognostic signatures developed in this study may inform early risk stratification and guide timely intervention, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.