ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026
Teaching sustainability through disaster simulation: A framework for planetary health education.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate‑driven disasters are increasing in frequency and severity, creating prolonged recovery periods and widening existing health inequities. As extreme weather events intensify, healthcare professionals must be prepared to mitigate risks, adapt to evolving conditions, and understand how environmental degradation influences population health. Simulation‑based education provides a safe, flexible platform for introducing these concepts while fostering core competencies in disaster preparedness. APPROACHES: This article outlines strategies for integrating planetary health and sustainability principles into climate‑driven disaster simulations across preparedness, response, and recovery phases. Approaches include using low‑waste modalities such as tabletop, hybrid, and digital simulations; repurposing expired non‑sterile supplies; and designing scenarios that explicitly incorporate resource stewardship. We distinguish between sustainability as curricular content (what learners are taught) and sustainability as operational practice (how simulations are conducted), arguing that both must be addressed to reduce the environmental footprint of training while advancing climate fluency. Embedding sustainability objectives into learning outcomes, debriefings, and evaluation metrics enables learners to examine both their clinical decision‑making and the environmental implications of their actions. The article also highlights opportunities to incorporate climate and sustainability concepts across undergraduate and graduate curricula. These strategies promote systems thinking, strengthen interprofessional collaboration, and support the development of clinicians who understand the links between climate change, health disparities, and responsible use of healthcare resources.
conclusionBy integrating sustainability, mitigation, and adaptation principles into disaster simulations, educators can prepare future healthcare professionals to respond effectively to climate‑driven crises while reducing the environmental impact of training itself. This intentional approach strengthens disaster readiness and cultivates a culture of environmental responsibility across health professional education This dual approach reframes disaster simulation as both clinical preparation and climate action within health professions education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.