Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877267›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2026

African carnivore gut bacterial diversity and composition are associated with sample condition but not storage technique.

Laura E Peirson, Erin A McKenney, Jessica R Patterson, James C Beasley, Stéphanie Périquet-Pearce, Claudine Cloete, Madeline H Melton, Brennan PetersonWood, Rubén Portas, Ortwin Aschenborn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura E PeirsonWildlife Ecology and Conservation Science Laboratory, Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, 1401 Presque Isle Ave., Marquette, MI, 49855, USA. peirson.laura@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3736-5117
Erin A McKenneyDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9874-1146
Jessica R PattersonSavannah River Ecology Laboratory, D. B. Warnell School of Forestry and Resources, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC, 29802, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9324-7496
James C BeasleySavannah River Ecology Laboratory, D. B. Warnell School of Forestry and Resources, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC, 29802, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9707-3713
Stéphanie Périquet-PearceOngava Research Centre, Windhoek, Namibia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-3729
Claudine CloeteEtosha Ecological Institute, Etosha National Park, Windhoek, Namibia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-7041
Madeline H MeltonSavannah River Ecology Laboratory, D. B. Warnell School of Forestry and Resources, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC, 29802, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1479-1392
Brennan PetersonWoodSavannah River Ecology Laboratory, D. B. Warnell School of Forestry and Resources, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC, 29802, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5396-6947
Rubén PortasDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research of Berlin, Alfred-Kowalke St. 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0686-0701
Ortwin AschenbornDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research of Berlin, Alfred-Kowalke St. 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7494-3795
Diana J R LaffertyWildlife Ecology and Conservation Science Laboratory, Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, 1401 Presque Isle Ave., Marquette, MI, 49855, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-7130

Funding

Northern Michigan University Peter White Scholar AwardU.S. Department of Energy Financial Assistance Award no. DE-EM0005228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive fecal sampling is essential for molecular wildlife studies such as gut microbiome (GMB) research, yet field conditions often limit preservation options. To test the effects of preservation methods on the results of GMB community composition, we compared gut bacterial communities in paired fecal samples preserved in stabilization tubes and air-dried in paper bags collected from anesthetized African lions (Panthera leo) and spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) in Etosha National Park, Namibia. Additional opportunistic samples from the ground around carnivore feeding sites that varied in moisture content were also analyzed. No differences in alpha or beta diversity were detected between preserved and dried samples, although bacterial beta diversity differed between preserved and opportunistic samples, supported by NMDS ordinations and PERMANOVA results. Core bacterial communities remained consistent across opportunistic sample conditions, indicating that host-associated taxa persist despite environmental exposure supporting the use of opportunistic samples for GMB studies in remote arid settings. However, consistent sampling protocols and future field-based desiccation studies remain critical for comparative analyses. These findings highlight that rapid air-drying offers a reliable, low-cost preservation option that maintains core microbiome patterns, expanding the feasibility of GMB research in remote or resource-limited field contexts where refrigeration and preservatives may be unavailable.

Indexed as

African carnivoreAnimal gut microbiomeBioinformaticsMetagenomicsMicrobiome techniques

Identifiers

PMID41877267
PMCPMC13134297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.