ArticleBMC nursing2026
The parallel mediating effects of work rumination between organizational trust and work-family conflict among emergency department nurses.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo investigate the parallel mediating roles of affective rumination and problem-solving pondering (components of work rumination) in the relationship between organizational trust and work-family conflict among emergency department (ED) nurses.
backgroundPromoting the balance between work and family for ED nurses is a favorable guarantee for maintaining social order. Organizational trust, as a beneficial resource for alleviating work-family conflict, has a positive significance for achieving work-family balance. However, the mediating mechanisms of the two dimensions of work rumination—affective rumination and problem-solving pondering—in the relationship between organizational trust and work-family conflict remain unclear.
methodsA cross-sectional study design was adopted. From March to May 2025, a convenient sampling method was used to conduct a survey on 240 eligible emergency department nurses from 22 hospitals in Chongqing, who completed the General Information Questionnaire, Organizational Trust Scale, Work Rumination Scale and Work-Family Conflict Scale. Data analysis was performed via structural equation modeling.
resultsThe scores of organizational trust, affective rumination, problem-solving pondering and work-family conflict among emergency department nurses were (43.86 ± 10.52), (14.18 ± 4.24), (16.81 ± 4.07) and (48.30 ± 13.75) respectively. Nurses who were male, aged 30–40 years, married, had two or more children, and worked more than 40 h per week had higher scores of work-family conflict. Affective rumination and problem-solving pondering exerted parallel mediating effects in the relationship between organizational trust and work-family conflict, with the effect values being − 0.088 and − 0.131 respectively.
conclusionAffective rumination and problem-solving pondering play parallel mediating roles in the association between organizational trust and work-family conflict among emergency department nurses. It is recommended that targeted intervention strategies be formulated for these two types of rumination to alleviate work-family conflict among emergency department nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.