ArticleGenome biology2026
ER tethering and active transport govern condensate diffusion during hyperosmotic stress.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ER tethering and active transport govern condensate diffusion during hyperosmotic stress.Genome biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHyperosmotic shock and the resulting cell volume compression are commonly experienced by organs such as the kidneys, causing rapid formation of hyperosmotic phase separation (HOPS) condensates in the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm. Although the causal relationship between hyperosmotic shock and condensation has been characterized, the diffusion dynamics of biomolecular condensates in hyperosmotically compressed cells and their underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown.
resultsWe systematically characterize the dynamics of HOPS condensates formed by model protein mRNA decapping enzyme 1A (DCP1A) through live-cell fluorescent single-particle tracking (SPT) across timescales. We find that HOPS condensates predominantly exhibit sub-diffusion rather than free diffusion, while a small fraction undergo bursts of super-diffusion. Using imaging to measure spatial accessibility inside cells and fluorescence labels for specific cellular organelles, we show that sub-diffusion arises from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) attachment, whereas super-diffusion reflects microtubule-dependent active transport. We further reconstruct spatial accessibility within hyperosmotically compressed cells using trajectories of genetically encoded multimeric nanoparticles (GEMs) and find that, despite compression, the cytoplasm remains accessible via diffusion and does not exhibit physical corralling. This indicates that restricted condensate mobility arises primarily from specific molecular interactions rather than from physical barriers.
conclusionsOur findings challenge the view that the cytosol becomes static and constrained during hyperosmotic compression. Instead, it remains dynamic, while condensates are spatially organized through docking to membrane structures with intermittent episodes of long-range transport. This model reshapes our understanding of the physical environment within stressed cells and provides a framework for how condensates achieve spatiotemporal organization through interactions with cellular structures and active processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.