ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Development and internal validation of a machine learning-based model to predict 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding with type 2 diabetes.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a life-threatening clinical event. Patients with diabetes have a higher risk of GIB. Therefore, it is crucial to predict the 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes with GIB.
methodsData from the Medical Information Marketplace for Intensive Care IV, with 1,048 patients were enrolled after applying exclusion criteria. The wrapper method was used to select the optimal subset of features by 10 machine learning learners. These 10 feature subsets in combination with 10 learners were used for model development. Model prediction performance was evaluated using time-dependent concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, brier scores, and decision curve analysis in both the training set and the internal validation set. The model was interpreted using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm.
resultsThe Accelerated Oblique Random Survival Forest (AORSF) model had the best predictive performance. The 8 predictors were age, sex, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Red Cell Distribution Width, White Blood Cell, Activated Partial Thromboplastin, Sodium, and Platelet. In the training set, the AUCs at days 60, 180 and 270 were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.87), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.84), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.86), respectively. The model demonstrated strong calibration, as evidenced by the calibration curves and low Brier scores.
conclusionInterpretable ML models for mortality prediction in diabetic GIB patients are feasible and demonstrate promising predictive performance, which can help clinicians assess disease severity and guide clinical management. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.