ArticleBMC nursing2026
How are nurses' individual and their colleagues' diversity factors associated with their cooperation behaviors in teams? - Results of an online factorial survey.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors related to community pharmacists' intention to provide collaborative deprescribing service for fall-risk medications in older adults: a factorial and theory-based cross-sectional study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Reconstructing a typology of approaches to navigating diversity: a comparative qualitative study of German nursing teams.BMC nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiversity within nursing teams in Germany increases due to staff shortages, nurse migration and the current academization of the profession. Little is known about how nurse’s own diversity factors and those of team members impact nurse’s perception and behavior in team situations. This study examines if and how nurses differentiate in the assessment of their colleagues’ nursing abilities in basic care, i.e. patient’s personal hygiene and treatment care, i.e. the set-up of an infusion, as well as their willingness to swap shifts with colleagues.
methodsA quasi-experimental, cross-sectional study with a factorial online survey with fictional case studies (vignettes) was conducted at two healthcare organizations in 2023 in a major city in Germany. Nurses ( > = 18 years) working in hospitals or nursing homes were eligible to participate. Associations of diversity factors, i.e., gender, age, migration background, and qualification, on the participant and vignette level on perceived competences and willingness to cooperate were analysed via multi-level fixed effects models.
resultsN = 684 nurses participated (76% female; mean age: 44.2 years; 88% born in Germany; 75% completed vocational training). Colleagues’ competency in patient’s personal hygiene was rated higher by respondents born in Germany (β = 0.42, p=.002; vs. foreign-born), when fictional colleagues were from Germany (β = 0.26, p<.001) or France (β = 0.09, p=.01; vs. China) and had completed vocational training (β = 0.06, p=.02; vs. a university degree). Competency in inserting infusions was rated higher by respondents born in Germany (β = 0.59, p=.002; vs. foreign-born), when fictional colleagues were from Germany (β = 0.33, p<.001) or France (β = 0.21, p<.001; vs. China) and when one worked together for months (β=-0.44, p<.001; vs. days). Willingness to swap shifts was affected by the length of collaboration (β=-0.09, p<.001) and their fictional colleagues’ age (β=-0.07, p=.02).
conclusionsHow nurses perceive their colleagues’ competences tended to be associated with their own and the other person’s migration background, while willingness to cooperate was affected by length of collaboration and colleagues’ age. However, limited generalizability of the findings applies due to our highly selective sample. Improving the onboarding process of new nurses in teams, and providing the time and space for professional exchange at work might improve mutual trust and teamwork in nursing. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.