Trial reportBMC medical education2026
Academic performance-based sequencing of inpatient and outpatient placements enhances learning in physiotherapy undergraduates: a controlled study.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate whether performance-based sequencing of clinical placements improves learning outcomes compared with randomized sequencing in undergraduate physiotherapy education.
methodsUndergraduate physiotherapy students from six universities in China were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group’s placement order (inpatient or outpatient) was determined based on theoretical and clinical performance, while the control group’s order was randomized. Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX), theoretical performance evaluation and the Clinical Reasoning and Reflection Self-Rating Scale (SACRR) were evaluated before and after placement using t-test.
results112 students participated in the study. Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical and theoretical performance post-placement. The experimental group had greater improvements in Mini-CEX scores (41.02 ± 12.37 vs. 38.35 ± 9.65, p = 0.031), with significant gains in history taking (p = 0.005), professionalism (p = 0.006), and counseling (p = 0.007). Theoretical test scores improved more in the experimental group (from 51.83 ± 9.89 to 69.00 ± 8.93 vs. 54.56 ± 7.62 to 66.52 ± 10.71, p = 0.038). The SACRR scores also showed greater improvements in the experimental group (92.13 ± 11.72 to 109.48 ± 10.63 vs. 91.30 ± 10.02 to 97.93 ± 10.63, p < 0.001), with significant gains across all subdomains.
conclusionsSequencing clinical placements according to student performance yielded greater improvements in history taking, professional attitude, and communication skills, as well as theoretical knowledge and clinical reasoning, compared with randomized sequencing. These findings suggest that performance-based placement scheduling can strengthen key patient interaction and reasoning competencies in physiotherapy students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.