ArticleBMC public health2026
E le Saua le Alofa (Love shouldn't hurt): exploring the acceptability, feasibility and potential impact of a co-developed intervention to prevent violence against women in Samoa.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can co-designing interventions with affected communities help prevent violence against women? Findings from a process evaluation of the E le Saua le Alofa (Love Shouldn't Hurt) pilot in Samoa.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Violence against women and children in the Pacific: A systematic scoping review and expert consultation of prevention interventions.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women in Samoa experience a high rate of intimate partner violence (IPV) shaped in part by a history of colonisation and its influence on gender roles and lived experiences. As part of the EVE Project to improve the evidence base for preventing IPV in high-prevalence settings, we co-developed an intervention with 30 community-based researchers (CBRs) from 10 villages, drawing from evidence-based modules previously developed and evaluated in other neo-colonial contexts. We assessed the pilot intervention’s acceptability, feasibility and potential impact when delivered to groups of 15 men and 15 women in 10 participating villages, using a mixed methods before (baseline) and after (endline) study design. We collected a baseline (N = 289) and endline survey (N = 229); ‘stories of change’ interviews with participants (N = 151); in-depth interviews (N = 14) with CBRs, and intervention evaluation workbooks from CBRs (N = 18). The acceptability of the intervention was assessed through retention rates and participant interviews, while feasibility was assessed by interviews with CBRs, and observations of survey implementation. The potential impact of the intervention on IPV experience and perpetration, and on gender views was explored via the analysis of survey data. Results suggest a reduction in IPV experience and perpetration at endline compared to baseline, but associations were non-significant. Women’s belief of non-equitable norms was also lower at endline (β = − 0.54, 95% CI − 0.88 to − 0.21, p = 0.005). Attendance was high overall (although men’s acceptability was challenging in some villages). Participants shared positive feedback on the delivery by CBRs and careful adaptation to fa’a Samoa (‘the Samoan way’). Further research aligned with the Indigenous context of Samoa is required to assess its effectiveness. The study was registered retrospective to the pilot but prior to analysis as ISRCTN17319820 on 14 March 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.