Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877094›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

E le Saua le Alofa (Love shouldn't hurt): exploring the acceptability, feasibility and potential impact of a co-developed intervention to prevent violence against women in Samoa.

Jenevieve Mannell, Papali'i Ene Isaako Hosea, Fa'afetai Alisi-Fesili, Siliniu Lina Chang, Helen Tanielu, Hattie Lowe, Faith Miller, Andrew Copas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenevieve MannellUCL Institute for Global Health, London, UK. j.mannell@ucl.ac.uk.
Papali'i Ene Isaako HoseaSamoa Victim Support Group, Apia, Samoa.
Fa'afetai Alisi-FesiliIndependent Consultant, Apia, Samoa.
Siliniu Lina ChangSamoa Victim Support Group, Apia, Samoa.
Helen TanieluNational University of Samoa, Apia, Samoa.
Hattie LoweUCL Institute for Global Health, London, UK.
Faith MillerUCL Institute for Global Health, London, UK.
Andrew CopasUCL Institute for Global Health, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women in Samoa experience a high rate of intimate partner violence (IPV) shaped in part by a history of colonisation and its influence on gender roles and lived experiences. As part of the EVE Project to improve the evidence base for preventing IPV in high-prevalence settings, we co-developed an intervention with 30 community-based researchers (CBRs) from 10 villages, drawing from evidence-based modules previously developed and evaluated in other neo-colonial contexts. We assessed the pilot intervention’s acceptability, feasibility and potential impact when delivered to groups of 15 men and 15 women in 10 participating villages, using a mixed methods before (baseline) and after (endline) study design. We collected a baseline (N = 289) and endline survey (N = 229); ‘stories of change’ interviews with participants (N = 151); in-depth interviews (N = 14) with CBRs, and intervention evaluation workbooks from CBRs (N = 18). The acceptability of the intervention was assessed through retention rates and participant interviews, while feasibility was assessed by interviews with CBRs, and observations of survey implementation. The potential impact of the intervention on IPV experience and perpetration, and on gender views was explored via the analysis of survey data. Results suggest a reduction in IPV experience and perpetration at endline compared to baseline, but associations were non-significant. Women’s belief of non-equitable norms was also lower at endline (β = − 0.54, 95% CI − 0.88 to − 0.21, p = 0.005). Attendance was high overall (although men’s acceptability was challenging in some villages). Participants shared positive feedback on the delivery by CBRs and careful adaptation to fa’a Samoa (‘the Samoan way’). Further research aligned with the Indigenous context of Samoa is required to assess its effectiveness. The study was registered retrospective to the pilot but prior to analysis as ISRCTN17319820 on 14 March 2024.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationSamoaYoung AdultAcceptability and feasibility studyCo-designIntimate partner violencePreventionSamoa

Identifiers

PMID41877094
PMCPMC13134231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.