ArticleBMC medical education2026
The integration of clinical pathway and case-based teaching in standardized residency training in the department of endocrinology.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndocrine and metabolic diseases exhibit considerable diversity, with clinical manifestations affecting virtually all body systems. Consequently, teaching in this field is highly specialized, posing significant challenges for students to master. It is worthwhile to discuss approaches to improving the teaching quality in endocrinology and metabolism. This study investigates the impact of integrating clinical pathway with representative cases studies on resident education in the department of endocrinology and metabolism.
methodsFrom January 2021 to January 2022, a total of 87 residents who received standardized training in the department of endocrinology and metabolism at our hospital were randomly assigned to either the traditional teaching method group or the clinical pathway combined with case-based teaching group. Upon joining the department, all students training in teaching methodologies, and their professional knowledge was systematically assessed and evaluated. At the conclusion of the four-week training program, students underwent a comprehensive reassessment, evaluation, and survey.
resultsThis study demonstrated that, compared with the traditional teaching method, the integration of clinical pathway and case-based teaching significantly improved students’ theoretical examination scores (p < 0.001) and Mini-CEX assessment scores (p < 0.001), as well as enhanced trainees’ overall satisfaction with their instructors (p < 0.01). Additionally, students in the group integrating clinical pathway and case-based teaching methods reported higher satisfaction with the teaching approach compared to those in the traditional teaching group (p = 0.000). Furthermore, the integration of clinical pathway and case-based teaching method has significantly enhanced students’ satisfaction with instruction (χ2 = 7.85, p = 0.005).
conclusionIt is suggested that the integration of clinical pathway with case-based teaching appears to be more beneficial and effective than traditional teaching method in enhancing the academic performance and clinical competencies of residents undergoing standardized training, while also yielding higher levels of students’ satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.