Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877085›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2026

Machine learning vs. radiomics for discriminating atypical cartilaginous tumors from benign enchondromas on MRI.

Simon Johannes Joham, Johannes Nikolaus Woltsche, Dieter Szolar, Andreas Leithner, Martin Urschler, Maria Anna Smolle

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon Johannes JohamInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 2/V, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Johannes Nikolaus WoltscheDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Dieter SzolarDiagnostikum Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andreas LeithnerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martin UrschlerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 2/V, 8036, Graz, Austria. martin.urschler@medunigraz.at.
Maria Anna SmolleDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/PAT1748423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnchondromas (EC) present cartilaginous tumors that are difficult to differentiate from their intermediate counterpart, atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACT). Histologically, tumor distinction of these entities is limited by sampling bias, while radiologically, similar lesion features render classification challenging. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate whether machine learning- or radiomics-based image analysis tools can reliably differentiate between EC and ACT using MRI data and corresponding expert annotations.

methodsBased on an MRI dataset of 206 unique patients (79 controls, 104 EC, 23 ACT), we develop a machine learning-based AI image analysis tool that uses the state-of-the-art nnU-Net framework for medical image segmentation and extends it for tumor classification. Two nnU-Net models (Scout and Specialist) are applied sequentially. Scout first detects images without tumor tissue and removes them from further analysis, whereas Specialist performs the final tumor classification on the remaining images. Alternatively, our tool supports radiomics-based classification using hand-crafted tumor characteristics.

resultsIn our cross-validation experiments, when using the two models approach, where Specialist follows Scout, we achieved 87% Sensitivity (95% CI [0.67, 0.96]) for the ACT class and 93% Sensitivity (95% CI [0.87, 0.97]) for the EC class. Furthermore, no image containing an ACT was classified as non-tumor.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, we demonstrated that MRI information alone can be used to differentiate between ACT and EC with high accuracy. These results seem promising that in future, machine learning and AI can be used for better orthopedic diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors in clinical practice.

Indexed as

ChondromaImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiomicsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedArtificial intelligenceAtypical cartilaginous tumorsEnchondromaMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomicsSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41877085
PMCPMC13134191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.