ArticleBiomedical engineering online2026
Machine learning vs. radiomics for discriminating atypical cartilaginous tumors from benign enchondromas on MRI.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnchondromas (EC) present cartilaginous tumors that are difficult to differentiate from their intermediate counterpart, atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACT). Histologically, tumor distinction of these entities is limited by sampling bias, while radiologically, similar lesion features render classification challenging. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate whether machine learning- or radiomics-based image analysis tools can reliably differentiate between EC and ACT using MRI data and corresponding expert annotations.
methodsBased on an MRI dataset of 206 unique patients (79 controls, 104 EC, 23 ACT), we develop a machine learning-based AI image analysis tool that uses the state-of-the-art nnU-Net framework for medical image segmentation and extends it for tumor classification. Two nnU-Net models (Scout and Specialist) are applied sequentially. Scout first detects images without tumor tissue and removes them from further analysis, whereas Specialist performs the final tumor classification on the remaining images. Alternatively, our tool supports radiomics-based classification using hand-crafted tumor characteristics.
resultsIn our cross-validation experiments, when using the two models approach, where Specialist follows Scout, we achieved 87% Sensitivity (95% CI [0.67, 0.96]) for the ACT class and 93% Sensitivity (95% CI [0.87, 0.97]) for the EC class. Furthermore, no image containing an ACT was classified as non-tumor.
conclusionsIn this pilot study, we demonstrated that MRI information alone can be used to differentiate between ACT and EC with high accuracy. These results seem promising that in future, machine learning and AI can be used for better orthopedic diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.