Trial reportBMC pediatrics2026
Effect of stress-ball play on pain and physiological responses during port-a-cath needle insertion in children undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPort-A-Cath needle insertion in pediatric chemotherapy is often painful and stressing. Distraction is a non-pharmacological method of pain management in invasive procedures in children. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of playing with stress ball on pain and physiological indicators at port needle insertion in children undergoing chemotherapy.
methodA randomized clinical trial was conducted with 60 children aged 3 to 7 years, who were randomly assigned to intervention group (n = 30) and control group (n = 30). Ten minutes before the port needle insertion, baseline physiological indicators were recorded and pain scores were measured by the FLACC and Wong-Baker FACES scales. In the intervention group, children played with a stress ball from ten minutes before and during the procedure, while the control group received routine care only. Physiological indicators and the FLACC score during needle insertion, as well as the Wong-Baker FACES self-reporting score immediately after the procedure, were recorded.
resultsAdjusted mean FLACC and Wong-Baker FACES pain scores were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (P = 0.043, F = 4.266; P = 0.031, F = 4.87 respectively). As for the physiological indicators, heart rate and systolic blood pressure during needle insertion were both significantly lower in intervention group (P < 0.001, F = 21.215; P < 0.001, F = 29.252 respectively). But there were no significant difference in diastolic blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation (P = 0.051, F = 3.983; P = 0.724, F = 0.724 respectively).
conclusionPlaying with stress ball can decrease pain and improve heart rate and systolic blood pressure during port needle insertion in children. Pediatric nurses should consider the use of stress ball play as a simple, safe and inexpensive nonpharmacological approach for managing children’s pain during painful procedures, especially port needle insertion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registration number IRCT20250318065123N1 on May 10, 2025 ( https://www.irct.ir/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.