ArticleBMC public health2026
Food systems and market pathways to childhood stunting in mining communities: evidence from a cross-sectional survey and a synthesis of context-responsive nutrition interventions.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMalnutrition remains a persistent global and public health challenge, with limited evidence available on the synthesis of empirical findings and feasibility of nutrition interventions across various settings, particularly in vulnerable mining communities. This study used empirical data, corresponding it with existing interventions to provide a benchmark for selecting effective nutrition strategies, thereby optimizing their impact.
methodsThis study used a cross-sectional design and evidence review of nutrition interventions to discuss the results. The target population included under-five children and their caregivers. The study had a sample size of 690 and used multistage random sampling technique to select participants. Data collection involved structured questionnaires, direct child measurements, and interviews. Anthropometric data used WHO standards to assess underweight. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and chi-square tests while evaluating context-specific nutrition interventions for their effectiveness and feasibility.
resultsThe study findings reveal a statistical significant association between owning a vegetable garden (P = 0.002), access to a market/farmers market (p < 0.001), access to income to buy food (P = 0.034), availability of food products (p < 0.001), access to main grocery store (p < 0.001), training in agriculture (p < 0.001), feeding strategies (p < 0.001) and under-five stunting. Based on the empirical data and analytical review of nutrition interventions, the following strategies are recommended: Community Nutrition Education Programs, Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection Programs, Nutrition-Focused Community Health Workers (CHWs), Digital Health and Nutrition Platforms and Local Food System Development. Integrating these interventions with the study’s findings will enhance their effectiveness and maximize impact.
conclusionThe findings display the complex interplay of factors affecting child stunting and health. Findings emphasize the importance of considering diverse contextual factors, intervention intensity, and the integration of food system transformation to optimize the impact of nutrition interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.