Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877028›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026

PURA-ECHO: Analysis of the evolution of Ultrasound utilization in austere health care settings in Costa Rica's Geographic Empanelment Model.

Sean Emerson Treacy Abarca, Marisela Aguilar, Natalia Padilla, Timothy Batchelor, Kenton L Anderson, Nicholas Ashenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sean Emerson Treacy AbarcaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 1200, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. streacyabarca@mednet.ucla.edu.
Marisela AguilarDepartment of Pediatrics, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, USA.
Natalia PadillaDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, 1007 E. Lowell Street, Tucson, Arizona, 85721, USA.
Timothy BatchelorDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, 500 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, USA.
Kenton L AndersonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, 500 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, USA.
Nicholas AshenburgDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, 500 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeographic empanelment, a model in which patients are assigned to healthcare facilities based on defined catchment areas, has been adopted by Costa Rica’s national health system (Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social, CCSS) to promote equitable distribution of healthcare resources. Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) and radiology-based consultative ultrasound have become an increasingly important diagnostic tool in emergency and primary care, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, little is known about how geographic and system-level factors influence ultrasound adoption across diverse care environments. This study evaluates temporal and geographic patterns of ultrasound utilization, including both POCUS and radiology-based (consultative) ultrasound, within the CCSS following the implementation of geographic empanelment.

methodsThe POCUS Utilization in Resource Austerity – Echocardiography (PURA-ECHO) study is a retrospective review of CCSS administrative data comparing ultrasound utilization across rural and urban Emergency Departments and urgent care clinics from 2006 to 2022. The primary outcome was the change in the number of POCUS and consultative ultrasound exams performed over time by geographic classification. Geospatial mapping was used to visualize topographical trends in ultrasound use, and linear regression models assessed the association between distance from urban referral centers and ultrasound adoption in rural facilities.

resultsRural ultrasound utilization demonstrated a highly significant increasing trend from 2006 to 2022 (Mann-Kendall τ = 0.927, p < 0.001), with mean exams per site increasing from 485 [SD 341] to 1,101 [SD 953]. Urban centers showed no significant change over the same period (τ = -0.162, p = 0.393), with mean exams per site remaining stable at 2,575 [SD 1,826] in 2006 and 2,652 [SD 1,356] in 2022. The expansion in ultrasound utilization was driven primarily by rural centers, which increased total exam volume 3.2-fold while urban capacity remained stable. Geographic distance from the tertiary training center did not significantly predict ultrasound adoption rates (R² = 0.09, p = 0.39), indicating equitable technology diffusion across rural regions regardless of proximity to urban centers.

conclusionUltrasound utilization expanded markedly across Costa Rica’s national health system following geographic empanelment, with rural centers demonstrating the most rapid growth. The lack of association between distance from urban centers and adoption rates suggests that the EBAIS infrastructure successfully facilitated equitable ultrasound diffusion across all rural regions. These findings suggest that geographic empanelment models can effectively strengthen both POCUS and radiology-based ultrasound capacity in geographically isolated regions, enhancing diagnostic equity and access within resource-limited healthcare systems.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyEmergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care SystemsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCatchment Area, HealthCosta RicaHumansResource-Limited SettingsRetrospective StudiesRural Health ServicesUltrasonographyEmergency medicineGISPoint of care UltrasoundRuralUnderserved

Identifiers

PMID41877028
PMCPMC13137645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.