ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Plastome evolution in annual Brachypodium species reveals widespread heteroplasmy and chloroplast capture, lineage-specific codon usage bias, and low positive selection.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComparative genomics and plastome phylogenomics have advanced significantly in recent years, highlighting the diversity, possible admixture, and non-neutral evolution of the predominantly considered non-recombinant chloroplast genomes in angiosperms. The grass genus Brachypodium serves as a powerful model for studying evolutionary processes in monocots.
resultsWe analyzed 287 plastomes across the native circum-Mediterranean range of the three annual Brachypodium species (B. distachyon, B. stacei, B. hybridum), focusing on their structural variation, selection patterns and phylogenomic relationships. Our analyses confirmed the differentiation of the S and D plastomes, inherited respectively from the diploid progenitor species B. stacei and B. distachyon. We identified novel structural rearrangements and indels, and unique repeat motifs, along with widespread heteroplasmy, particularly in ancestral B. hybridum-D plastotypes. SNP diversity varied among plastotypes, reflecting population dynamics and evolutionary histories, with B. hybridum-D plastotypes showing the highest normalized diversity and B. hybridum-S the lowest. Positive selection was detected in 29 plastid genes by Tajima’s neutrality test, and in nine genes by site and branch-site evolutionary models, including matK, ndhF, rbcL, and rpoC2. Phylogenomic analyses revealed well-supported clades corresponding to the S and D plastome lineages, with frequent chloroplast capture events and long-distance dispersals shaping their evolutionary trajectories.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the evolutionary complexity of the Brachypodium panplastome, emphasizing the roles of heteroplasmy, structural variation, and adaptive evolution in shaping plastome diversity in this group of model grasses. While the ancestral plastomes of B. hybridum-D show evidence of heteroplasmy caused by introgressive hybridization and recombination, most of the heteroplasmic patterns in the other plastome groups can be attributed to somatic mutations. The topological congruence of phylogenies based on neutrally evolving whole plastome sequences and the majority of the plastid encoding gene sequences, including positively selected genes like ndhF, underscores the robustness of plastome-based phylogenies even under selective pressures. Together, these results shed new light on the evolutionary complexity of plastid genomes in a model polyploid system, demonstrating the interplay of structural divergence, heteroplasmy, hybridization, and selection in shaping plastome diversity. Our work thus provides a valuable comparative framework for future evolutionary, ecological, and functional genomic studies in Brachypodium and other grasses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.