ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Leaf and stem nutrient variation patterns and controls of Chenopodioideae plants along a desert transect in Central Asia.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chenopodioideae plants are dominant components of desert ecosystems in arid regions of China and Central Asia and play key roles in maintaining ecosystem stability, while also providing valuable systems for understanding evolutionary and environmental adaptations of desert vegetation. However, at the family level, stoichiometric patterns across functional groups and plant organs in Chenopodioideae species remain poorly understood. We investigated 68 desert sites along a > 2000 km desert transect in northwestern China and collected leaf and stem samples from 39 Chenopodioideae species. After data preprocessing and standardization, 167 independent leaf units and 161 independent stem units were retained for subsequent analyses. We examined variation patterns and environmental drivers of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) across functional groups (C3 vs. C4 plants; trees, shrubs, and herbs) and organs (stems and leaves) at the community level. Compared with global and national datasets, Chenopodioideae plants exhibited lower N concentrations (8.846 mg g− 1 in stems and 15.768 mg g− 1 in leaves) but higher P (1.235 mg g− 1 and 1.497 mg g− 1) and K concentrations (23.758 mg g− 1 and 27.656 mg g− 1), suggesting potential nitrogen limitation. Significant differences in nutrient concentrations were observed among most functional groups and organs. Based on community-weighted means, leaves exhibited consistently lower P-K scaling exponents than stems across functional groups, suggesting enhanced K-related stress resistance. Stem and leaf N, P, N: P, and P: K exhibited homeostatic or strictly homeostatic patterns, supporting the “Stability of Limiting Elements Hypothesis”. Nutrient traits showed divergent responses along latitude, longitude, and aridity gradients, reflecting diverse adaptive strategies. Environmental drivers varied among traits and organs. Soil, climatic, and geographical factors jointly regulated nutrient concentrations and ratios through interacting pathways, with soil factors generally exerting stronger relative influences. Overall, our findings reveal differentiated yet partially convergent stoichiometric strategies among functional groups and organs, highlighting adaptive nutrient regulation mechanisms in arid desert ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.