ArticleNature ecology & evolution2026
Missing planktivore functions drive global variation in reef fish productivity.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Missing planktivore functions drive global variation in reef fish productivity.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The functioning of high-diversity ecosystems, such as coral reefs, is intrinsically tied to the integrity and efficiency of the trophic pathways within these systems. Coral reef productivity depends, in part, on the input of external nutrients, primarily zooplankton, that is assimilated by extraordinarily diverse fish communities. The plankton-planktivore trophic pathway is thus crucial for sustaining the productivity that exemplifies coral reef ecosystems; however, it remains poorly understood at large spatial scales. Here we explore global patterns in reef fish community structure, revealing a major discrepancy between the Indo-Pacific and Caribbean in the productivity and fisheries potential of planktivorous reef fishes. Indo-Pacific reefs support 6.6 times more planktivorous fish biomass and 3.4 times greater productivity than the Caribbean, a difference largely due to the marked contribution of species that feed on gelatinous plankton in the Indo-Pacific. Although species that feed on gelatinous plankton constitute only 4% of the planktivorous fish abundance in the Indo-Pacific, they account for one-third of the biomass and one-quarter of the productivity. This divergence reflects the contrasting biogeographic histories of the two realms, with Indo-Pacific oceanography fostering diversification, while repeated extinction events and trophic erosion may have constrained planktivory in the Caribbean. Ultimately, these differences in energy flow translate into fundamental differences in coral reef functioning and, potentially, their capacity to support ecosystem services, including fisheries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.