ReviewSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
Craniofacial endotype of obstructive sleep apnea: Spatial matrix hypothesis.
Review in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This overview examines the craniofacial and myopathic endotypes of obstructive sleep apnea in relation to the spatial matrix hypothesis. Recently, attention has been drawn to the phenotype of obstructive sleep apnea since this condition includes neurologic, metabolic, craniofacial and myopathic endotypes. Most often, practitioners of dental sleep medicine focus their attention on the manipulation of the mandible for therapeutic purposes, but the etiology of the craniofacial endotype may reside elsewhere. Specifically, in line with the cranio-caudal gradient of development, consideration needs to be given to cranial base morphology during diagnostic assessment and treatment planning. In addition, the nasomaxillary complex needs to be examined since, empirically, the floor of the nose is the roof of the mouth and midfacial developmental compensation is not uncommon. Indeed, mandibular morphology needs to be evaluated since its clinical variation ranges from mandibular retrognathia to prognathism, and mandibular advancement may not be the treatment of choice in certain cases. Apart from skeletal considerations, soft tissue contributors to the upper airway, such as tongue position and pharyngeal muscle tone, need to be studied to hone case selection and targeted treatment planning. Therefore, the developmental dynamics of the upper airway are integrated, using the spatial matrix hypothesis, to help elucidate the patho-etiology in the clinical presentation of the craniofacial and myopathic endotypes of obstructive sleep apnea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41876872What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.