ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2026
Microbial phosphorus cycling in terrestrial ecosystems.
Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomic Insights into Microbial Functional Potential Associated with Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Cycling Along an Elevational Gradient in a Warm-Temperate Forest.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Can Beneficial Microorganisms Reduce Phosphorus Application Rates in Common Bean (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Iron-Modified Biochar Reduces Phosphorus Leaching and Maintains Microbial Network Complexity in Acidic Soils Under Simulated Intense Rainfall.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Patterns and drivers of leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry in the desert steppe of the Ili River Basin.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Manure substitution counteracts mineral nitrogen-driven erosion of theISME communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phosphorus is an essential yet often limiting macronutrient that shapes primary productivity and microbial activity in terrestrial ecosystems. Unlike carbon and nitrogen cycles, which have gaseous phases, the terrestrial phosphorus cycle is primarily governed by soil biogeochemistry, wherein microorganisms orchestrate key transformations. This Review synthesizes current knowledge of the microbial phosphorus cycle, emphasizing the diverse mechanisms used by bacteria, fungi and archaea to mobilize phosphorus (for example, via phosphatases such as PhoA and PhoD and organic acids such as citrate) and to directly enhance plant phosphorus uptake. We explore the ecological significance of these processes in maintaining soil health, supporting ecosystem productivity and influencing carbon sequestration. We propose the Microbial Phosphorus Adaptive Evolution Theory (MPAET): chronic phosphorus scarcity drives evolutionary and ecological shifts in microbial communities towards higher scavenging investment, polyphosphate handling and lipid remodelling. Furthermore, we examine how environmental factors, land use and climate modulate these shifts (for example, phoD expression increases under phosphorus stress), with cascading effects on ecosystem function and global phosphorus availability. New technologies such as metagenomics,
Indexed as
Identifiers
41876857What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.