ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimising pandemic response through vaccination strategies using neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidemic risk assessment poses inherent challenges, with traditional approaches often failing to balance health outcomes and economic constraints. This paper presents a data-driven decision support tool that models epidemiological dynamics and optimises vaccination strategies to control disease spread while minimising economic losses. The proposed economic-epidemiological framework comprises three phases: modelling, optimising, and analysing. First, a stochastic SVEI3RD compartmental model with eight state variables captures epidemic dynamics, stratifying infections by severity to enable detailed healthcare cost estimation. Second, an optimal control problem is formulated to derive vaccination strategies that minimise pandemic-related expenditures, encompassing vaccination costs, quarantine subsidies, healthcare expenditures, and economic productivity losses. The resulting high-dimensional stochastic control problem renders classical numerical methods computationally intractable due to the curse of dimensionality. To overcome this challenge, Physics-Informed Neural Networks are employed to calibrate model parameters by embedding the stochastic differential equations into the loss function. For the optimal control problem, a deep neural network architecture comprising feedforward subnetworks at each time step directly approximates the time-varying vaccination rate. The framework is demonstrated using COVID-19 data from Victoria, Australia. The numerical results show that, compared to the no-vaccination strategy, the optimal strategy reduces cumulative hospital-days by 85.3%, deaths by 84.4%, and total costs by 22.3%. These reductions exceed those achieved by the actual government rollout by approximately 4 to 6 percentage points. By employing this framework, policymakers can continuously update strategies to minimise aggregate costs and aid future pandemic preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.