ArticleScientific reports2026
A brain-edge co-evolution framework for zero-trust real-time hot patching in power equipment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Under current zero-trust security architectures, real-time hot patching of power field equipment remains constrained by three critical technological limitations: excessive authentication latency that violates millisecond-level control requirements, the lack of quantitative mechanisms to prevent runtime structural disorder during patch injection, and the absence of effective integration between human operational expertise and automated decision systems. These limitations make existing zero-trust and fully automated hot patching approaches unsuitable for safety-critical power equipment operating under strict real-time and fault-intolerant conditions. To address these gaps, this paper proposes a brain–computer co-evolution–driven negative entropy zero-trust hot patching framework. Compared with conventional zero-trust implementations and automated reinforcement learning–based patching strategies, the proposed method introduces human EEG-derived risk intuition into the security decision loop and establishes a multidimensional negative entropy model to explicitly quantify and constrain system structural order during runtime updates. By combining these mechanisms with millisecond-level eBPF-based atomic code replacement, the framework aligns strong security verification with real-time operational constraints. Experimental results on an RTDS simulation platform and a real IED cluster (1,200 hot patching operations) demonstrate that the proposed framework reduces high-risk security decision latency to 12.3 ms—significantly lower than current zero-trust baselines—while limiting entropy increase risk to 3.5% and maintaining 99.99% service availability. These results indicate that the proposed approach bridges a critical gap between current zero-trust standards and the practical requirements of real-time, safety-critical power equipment updates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.