Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876813›Full record

ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026

Microneedle-Assisted Delivery of Biologics: From Large Molecules to Cancer Vaccines.

Salma Younas, Mohit Kumar, Ramsha Khalid, Kirthana Gopal, Akshay Kumar, Pornanong Aramwit, Syed Mahmood

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Salma YounasDepartment of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9649-6820
Mohit KumarChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140401, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-9295
Ramsha KhalidDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9373-0443
Kirthana GopalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0147-7779
Akshay KumarChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140401, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6715-638X
Pornanong AramwitFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Pathum Wan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-2431
Syed MahmoodDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia. syedmahmood@um.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9052-147X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide- and protein-based biologics, including therapeutic peptides, monoclonal antibodies, and vaccines, have transformed modern therapeutics. However, they remain constrained by poor oral bioavailability, stability challenges, cold-chain dependence, and limited patient acceptability associated with injectable administration. This review critically evaluates recent technological advances, therapeutic applications, and translational progress of microneedle (MN)-assisted delivery systems for biologics, with an emphasis on insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, monoclonal antibodies, and cancer vaccines. MN platforms enable minimally invasive transdermal delivery that bypasses gastrointestinal degradation and first-pass metabolism, while facilitating intradermal immune targeting. Dissolving and polymeric MNs offer advantages such as enhanced thermostability, elimination of sharp waste, and potential reduction of cold-chain requirements, supporting broader global health deployment. Smart and responsive MNs further enable controlled and on-demand biological release in response to physiological cues. Preclinical and early phase clinical studies have demonstrated pharmacokinetic performance comparable to or exceeding conventional subcutaneous delivery for insulin, GLP-1 analogs, and selected therapeutic proteins, as well as enhanced immunogenicity for vaccines. However, clinical translation is influenced by MN type, injection volume, and device design, with some hollow MN systems associated with increased pain compared to conventional injections. Remaining challenges include scalable good manufacturing practice (GMP)-compliant production, biologic stability during fabrication and sterilization, and harmonized regulatory pathways for drug-device combination products. Overall, MN-assisted delivery represents a promising strategy for patient-centered, stable, and accessible biologic therapies.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsCancer VaccinesDrug Delivery SystemsAdministration, CutaneousAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological AvailabilityHumansInsulinMicroneedle Drug DeliveryAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological ProductsCancer VaccinesInsulinbiologicsmicroneedlespeptidestransdermal Deliveryvaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.