ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Microneedle-Assisted Delivery of Biologics: From Large Molecules to Cancer Vaccines.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptide- and protein-based biologics, including therapeutic peptides, monoclonal antibodies, and vaccines, have transformed modern therapeutics. However, they remain constrained by poor oral bioavailability, stability challenges, cold-chain dependence, and limited patient acceptability associated with injectable administration. This review critically evaluates recent technological advances, therapeutic applications, and translational progress of microneedle (MN)-assisted delivery systems for biologics, with an emphasis on insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, monoclonal antibodies, and cancer vaccines. MN platforms enable minimally invasive transdermal delivery that bypasses gastrointestinal degradation and first-pass metabolism, while facilitating intradermal immune targeting. Dissolving and polymeric MNs offer advantages such as enhanced thermostability, elimination of sharp waste, and potential reduction of cold-chain requirements, supporting broader global health deployment. Smart and responsive MNs further enable controlled and on-demand biological release in response to physiological cues. Preclinical and early phase clinical studies have demonstrated pharmacokinetic performance comparable to or exceeding conventional subcutaneous delivery for insulin, GLP-1 analogs, and selected therapeutic proteins, as well as enhanced immunogenicity for vaccines. However, clinical translation is influenced by MN type, injection volume, and device design, with some hollow MN systems associated with increased pain compared to conventional injections. Remaining challenges include scalable good manufacturing practice (GMP)-compliant production, biologic stability during fabrication and sterilization, and harmonized regulatory pathways for drug-device combination products. Overall, MN-assisted delivery represents a promising strategy for patient-centered, stable, and accessible biologic therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41876813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.