ArticleScientific reports2026
Differential impact of various in-class physical exercise interventions on cognitive function and mathematics achievement in primary school children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical activity is increasingly recognized for its dual role in enhancing both physical health and cognitive development. This study compared the effects of three types of in-class interventions-CARDIO (aerobic/anaerobic exercises), BALANCE (balance training), and MENTAL (cognitive training without physical activity)-on cognitive function and mathematics achievement among primary school students, including a subsample with lower concentration scores. A total of 157 students from the 2nd and 3rd grades were assigned to one of the intervention groups. The interventions were conducted daily for 15 min over a 5-week period. Cognitive function was assessed using the KoKi concentration test, and academic achievement in mathematics was evaluated with a curriculum-based assessment. Concentration levels were increased in all groups, but only the BALANCE and MENTAL groups showed significant improvements in both easy and complex math exercises. In students with lower concentration scores, greater gains in simpler math tasks were observed for BALANCE and MENTAL groups. Both physical (BALANCE) and non-physical (MENTAL) breaks were associated with improvements in concentration and mathematics performance. Considering widespread sedentary behavior, physically active breaks may provide added health-related benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.