Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876756›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Local regrowth: what are the surgical options?]

J Reibetanz, C T Germer, M Kelm

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J ReibetanzKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland. reibetanz_j@ukw.de.
C T GermerKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
M KelmKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The different treatment concepts for rectal cancer are in a continuous state of change and were recently summarized and presented in the updated German S3 guidelines. While organ preservation is of increasing importance in the clinical routine, modern multimodal total neoadjuvant treatment strategies can achieve complete and nearly complete response rates of up to 50%. For these patients this subsequently means the necessity for close monitoring models in a watch-and-wait concept, whereby various studies have now shown local recurrence rates of25-30% within the first 2 years. Due to increasing implementation of effective total neoadjuvant treatment concepts and the accompanying increasing incidence of local recurrence after initial complete response, the question of the optimal treatment regimen in these situations increasingly arises. This article summarizes the current evidence in this context and presents an interdisciplinary treatment algorithm.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalRectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyLocal recurrenceMonitoring modelOrgan preservationResponse rateTotal neoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.