Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876723›Full record

Observational studyOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026

Clinical impact of acute symptomatic vertebral fractures in the United States: A patient survey and chart review.

Steven W Ing, Michele McDermott, Eric Yeh, Joseph M Lane, Jolenta Cheung, Mona Amet, Neil Binkley, Felicia Cosman

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steven W IngDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 547 McCampbell Hall, 1581 Dodd Drive, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. steven.ing@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4343-6723
Michele McDermottAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Eric YehAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Joseph M LaneHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Jolenta CheungAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Mona AmetAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Neil BinkleyUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Felicia CosmanColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This survey of 116 patients aged ≥ 50 years with ≥ 1 confirmed symptomatic vertebral fracture within 36 weeks prior to enrollment showed that pain related to fracture persisted after 24 weeks for a subset of patients and affected activities of daily living. These data emphasize the importance of vertebral fracture prevention. PURPOSE: To describe pain persistence, severity, and effect on ADLs after symptomatic vertebral fracture.

methodsThis was an observational cross-sectional survey of patients recruited from 7 United States clinical sites aged ≥ 50 years with ≥ 1 symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral fracture diagnosed within the prior 36 weeks. Patients' experience of pain and its impact on ADLs during the past 7 days before the patient survey were evaluated. Data were collected through one-time patient surveys and retrospective medical chart review and analyzed descriptively.

resultsOf 116 patients enrolled, most were postmenopausal women (83%), White (92%), and aged ≥ 65 years (83%); 37% were recruited within 12 weeks, 40% within > 12-24 weeks, and 23% within > 24-36 weeks of the symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Fractures were confirmed by x-ray (60%), magnetic resonance imaging (50%), and/or computed tomography scan (37%). Within 12 weeks of a vertebral fracture, pain was reported as constant/steady by 42% of patients. Pain frequency decreased over time, but even among patients with vertebral fracture > 24-36 weeks earlier, > 20% still reported constant/steady pain and > 80% reported at least intermittent pain. Pain severity scores of 7-10 were reported by 44% within 12 weeks, 30% within > 12-24 weeks, and 36% within > 24-36 weeks following the vertebral fracture. The most common movements increasing pain were standing up (55%), bending down (53%), and lifting (42%). ADLs most impacted were housework and walking.

conclusionIn this study, pain related to fracture persisted after 24 weeks and affected ADLs, emphasizing the importance of vertebral fracture prevention and pain management strategies.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesActivities of Daily LivingAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overBack PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesActivities of daily livingOsteoporosisPainPatient-reported outcomesVertebral fracture

Identifiers

PMID41876723
PMCPMC13661677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.