ReviewJournal of human hypertension2026
Scientific advances in post-exercise hypotension: a bibliometric review.
Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to perform a bibliometric review to map scientific advances and research trends related to post-exercise hypotension (PEH), a transient blood pressure reduction following physical exercise, increasingly recognized as a non-pharmacological strategy for hypertension management. A comprehensive search was conducted on Scopusdatabase to identify publications on PEH from 1985 to 2024. Metadata from 440 selected articles were analyzed using VOSviewer™ and Gephi™ software to construct keyword co-occurrence networks and identify emerging research topics, influential authors, and leading institutions. Bibliometric analysis revealed an increasing trend in PEH publications over the past decade, with Brazil and the United States leading in research output. High-intensity interval training, isometric resistance exercise and nutritional interventions emerged as key topics. Findings emphasized exercise intensity, recovery posture, and dietary strategies modulate PEH magnitude and duration. Complex autonomic and vascular factors were consistently implicated as physiological mechanisms of PEH, supporting the importance of individualized exercise prescriptions. This review highlights the growing clinical and scientific importance of PEH research. Notable gaps include the need for standardized assessment methodologies, greater biomarker utilization, and further evaluation of multimodal exercise-nutrition strategies to improve clinical translation. Future studies should expand PEH research in clinically high-risk and underrepresented groups (e.g., older adults and individuals with cardiometabolic or renal comorbidities), using harmonized protocols to enhance comparability and applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.