ArticleScientific reports2026
Key natural influences on groundwater storage changes in Central and Southern Arizona.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Groundwater sustainability in Central and Southern Arizona is threatened by prolonged droughts, rising temperatures, reduced surface water supplies, and groundwater overdraft. Recent studies indicate accelerating declines in regional groundwater storage. While the anthropogenic drivers of these declines are relatively well understood, the role of natural hydroclimatic variability in groundwater storage changes has received less attention. In this study, we utilize NASA's Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its successor, GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO), together with NASA's Western Land Data Assimilation System (WLDAS) to evaluate the hydroclimatic controls on Groundwater Storage Anomalies (GWSA) variability in Central and Southern Arizona. We quantify long-term standardized trends, subbasin-scale correlations, and dominant modes of natural variability using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) from 2004 to 2021. Principal components are then used to group groundwater subbasins using k-means clustering, an unsupervised machine learning algorithm, and results are compared with in situ measurements and local management strategies. Our results show substantial spatial heterogeneity across the region. This heterogeneity is characterized by recharge-responsive northern and central subbasins, which are influenced primarily by precipitation and subsurface runoff, and loss-dominated southern subbasins, associated with weaker natural recharge and stronger atmospheric demand. PCA shows that natural hydroclimatic variability is statistically aligned with approximately 16% of the inter-subbasin spatial variance in GRACE/FO groundwater storage trends. Within this natural component, total evapotranspiration (~ 29%), precipitation (~ 23%), and subsurface runoff (~ 20%) represent the largest contributors to the explained variance. The remaining spatial variance may reflect anthropogenic influences, geologic heterogeneity, and residual observational or modeling uncertainties. Our diagnostic framework identifies groundwater subbasin clusters driven by shared hydroclimatic modes. It has the potential to serve as a transferable tool for recharge feasibility analysis, groundwater sustainability assessments, and future local groundwater planning in the Lower Colorado River Basin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.