ArticleScientific reports2026
A machine learning-derived biological age model for liver grafts provides a superior assessment of aging compared to chronological age in transplantation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver transplantation is severely restricted by shortages of donors, yet relying on chronological age (CA) for donor selection often results in potentially viable grafts being discarded. This study developed a machine learning-based framework to predict the biological age (BA) of liver grafts and evaluate its clinical utility. Data from 247 donors were analyzed to create BA models using conventional linear methods and four genetic algorithm-optimized machine learning models. These models were then validated in an independent temporal cohort of 82 donor-recipient pairs. While multiple linear regression (MLR) showed a higher correlation (r = 0.82), the gradient boosting (GB) model captured unique nonlinear biological signals. Importantly, BA derived from the GB model demonstrated superior clinical relevance, serving as an independent predictor of biliary complications (AUC = 0.80) and graft survival, whereas CA failed to predict these outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that accelerated ageing, defined as a BA exceeding CA, was an independent risk factor for graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio = 4.188). This exploratory study suggests that BA captures the aging heterogeneity of liver grafts which cannot be identified by the CA of donors. Furthermore, the genetic algorithm-optimized model shows potential in predicting biliary complications and survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.