Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876682›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Lightweight and interpretable edge intelligence AI with intrusion detection for trustworthy cardiac arrhythmia in medical IoT.

Muhammad Imran Khalid, Altaf Hussain, Nasir Hussain, Tamim Alkhalifah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Imran Khalid *School of Computer Science and Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, 400065, China.
Altaf Hussain *School of Computer Science and Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, 400065, China.
Nasir HussainSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, 400065, China.
Tamim AlkhalifahDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia. tkhliefh@qu.edu.sa.

Funding

Qassim University QU-APC-2026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical Internet of Things (MIoT) systems enable continuous cardiac monitoring, but practical deployment is limited by three issues: heavy computation at the edge, limited interpretability, and vulnerability to cyber-attacks that can corrupt signals and degrade inference. We propose CLARITY-AI 2.0, a lightweight and trustworthy arrhythmia detection framework for MIoT that combines efficient ECG feature extraction, interpretable prediction, and security-aware trust assessment. The model performs arrhythmia inference using a compact feature-based learner and generates clinician-facing explanations via SHAP attributions, which are converted into structured natural-language reports using an LLM. To improve trust under hostile network conditions, an intrusion detection module outputs an attack probability and a trust score that flags unreliable inputs. On the MIT-BIH benchmark, CLARITY-AI 2.0 achieves an F1 score of 0.928 and an AUC of 0.985 for anomaly detection. It also generalizes under dataset shift with an AUC of 0.940 on PTB-XL and an AUC of 0.915 on Chapman (zero-shot evaluation). For edge feasibility, deployment on an ESP32 reduces the footprint to 350 KB, peak RAM to 120 KB, and inference latency to 8.1 ms, supporting real-time operation on resource-constrained devices. These results indicate that CLARITY-AI 2.0 is an interpretable, efficient, and security-aware approach toward scalable MIoT-based cardiac monitoring.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacArtificial IntelligenceInternet of ThingsAlgorithmsComputer SecurityElectrocardiographyHumansIntelligent SystemsArrhythmia detectionCLARITY-AIExplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)Interpretable machine learningIntrusion detection systemMedical internet of things

Identifiers

PMID41876682
PMCPMC13168234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.