ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive training load optimization for track and field athletes: A reinforcement learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and sports genomics: advancing precision sports science and athletic performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimization of a training program for an athlete is a difficult issue in sport science. It is a delicate trade-off between stimulating performance enhancement and allowing adequate recovery to prevent injury. The paper, presents a detailed structure of the offline optimization of training loads using the DQN architecture. The framework overcomes the simulation gap by applying a data-driven transition model as a digital twin, which can be used to find the optimal training policies without the ethical or safety concerns of conducting the experiment in real-time on athletes. This intelligent model, founded on comprehensive physiological and performance data collected from 25 athletes over a whole training season, has the capacity to dynamically provide ideal training prescriptions like increased intensity, increased volume, or active recovery. Considered data include parameters such as Heart Rate Variability (HRV), sleep quality, training loads, Acute to Chronic Workload Ratio (ACWR), and weekly performance. The proposed architecture uses a feedforward neural network as an estimator of the Q-value function. By optimizing the adaptive ε-Greedy policy and the Experience Replay Buffer, the stability and efficiency of the learning process are ensured. In addition, a dual reward function including performance reward and physiological state reward is designed. This function guides the agent towards policies that simultaneously lead to short-term performance improvement and long-term health maintenance of the athlete. The experimental results show that the model has successfully reduced the error rate and has tended to converge to near zero for the loss function. Also, the proposed method has shown a high ability in managing training load and controlling the risk of injury, in such a way that it has been able to dynamically and with high adaptability reduce the risk and always maintain the performance of athletes within the optimal range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.