ArticleScientific reports2026
Discovery of key surface electromyography features during walking for discerning high and low muscle mass using machine learning analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low muscle mass is associated with adverse health outcomes not only in older adults, but also in young and middle-aged adults. However, traditional muscle mass assessments rely on specialized equipment and sufficient physical space, limiting their applicability in primary care and community settings. Additionally, machine learning-based approaches suffer from limited interpretability owing to their black-box nature. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a machine learning-based approach using surface electromyography (sEMG) signals recorded during walking to classify muscle mass levels and identify key features underlying the model’s decisions in young and middle-aged adults. We enrolled 133 community-dwelling adults aged 20–59 years (71 men, 53.4%; 62 women, 46.6%). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody 970). Participants were divided into low- and high–muscle-mass groups using unsupervised k-means clustering. Five classifiers (logistic regression, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting) were trained, and performance was compared for normal and fast walking. Model interpretability was assessed with Shapley additive explanations. The low- and high- muscle-mass groups had mean ages of 36.12 and 39.84 years (p = 0.086), respectively. Extreme gradient boosting achieved the highest accuracy during normal walking (95%), whereas random forest performed best during fast walking (94%). During fast walking, a higher zero crossing rate of the biceps femoris contributed most to classifying higher muscle mass; during normal walking, a lower maximum power of the tibialis anterior was most influential. These findings demonstrate a feasible and interpretable approach to stratifying muscle mass from sEMG during gait. Larger and more diverse dataset are warranted to improve generalizability and support potential clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.