ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning approach for adult age estimation using dental characteristics on panoramic radiographs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid approach with convolutional neural network and regression models for age estimation in panoramic radiographs.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental characteristics are increasingly considered valuable indicators for adult age estimation in forensic and clinical contexts, yet conventional methods struggle with complex dental data. Conventional linear regression relies on predefined equations and the number of dental characteristics aggregated across the dentition, which may lead to information loss and reduced accuracy. This study investigated machine learning methods to enhance age estimation using encoded dental characteristics. Panoramic radiographs of 2,415 individuals aged 20 to 89 years were analyzed, and dental characteristics were encoded using a modified one-hot encoding approach that preserved dual-feature information. A numerical study compared linear regression and six machine learning methods, including random forest, extreme gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision tree, and multi-layer perceptron. Model performance was evaluated using the root mean squared error (RMSE) and R-squared statistic on the test dataset. In the sex-aggregated dataset, linear regression achieved an RMSE of 12.04 years with an R-squared of 0.63, whereas the best-performing machine learning model achieved an RMSE of 10.88 years with an R-squared of 0.70. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that sound and missing teeth were the most influential predictors of age estimation. Given the magnitude of prediction error, the proposed models should be interpreted as adjunctive tools for dental age estimation in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.