Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876622›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning approach for adult age estimation using dental characteristics on panoramic radiographs.

Donghwan Lee, Sehyun Oh, Seyeon Hwang, Jiae Park, Yujin Oh, Akiko Kumagai, Sang-Seob Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Donghwan LeeDepartment of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-6876
Sehyun OhDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Seyeon HwangDepartment of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea.
Jiae ParkDepartment of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea.
Yujin OhDepartment of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea.
Akiko KumagaiDivision of Forensic Odontology and Disaster Oral Medicine, Department of Forensic Science, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, 028-3694, Japan.
Sang-Seob LeeDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea. sslee1418@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0171-561X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1F1A1063719National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2C1012865, RS-2022-00155966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental characteristics are increasingly considered valuable indicators for adult age estimation in forensic and clinical contexts, yet conventional methods struggle with complex dental data. Conventional linear regression relies on predefined equations and the number of dental characteristics aggregated across the dentition, which may lead to information loss and reduced accuracy. This study investigated machine learning methods to enhance age estimation using encoded dental characteristics. Panoramic radiographs of 2,415 individuals aged 20 to 89 years were analyzed, and dental characteristics were encoded using a modified one-hot encoding approach that preserved dual-feature information. A numerical study compared linear regression and six machine learning methods, including random forest, extreme gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision tree, and multi-layer perceptron. Model performance was evaluated using the root mean squared error (RMSE) and R-squared statistic on the test dataset. In the sex-aggregated dataset, linear regression achieved an RMSE of 12.04 years with an R-squared of 0.63, whereas the best-performing machine learning model achieved an RMSE of 10.88 years with an R-squared of 0.70. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that sound and missing teeth were the most influential predictors of age estimation. Given the magnitude of prediction error, the proposed models should be interpreted as adjunctive tools for dental age estimation in adults.

Indexed as

Age Determination by TeethMachine LearningRadiography, PanoramicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestSupport Vector MachineAdultDental age estimationDental characteristicLinear regressionMachine learningPanoramic radiograph

Identifiers

PMID41876622
PMCPMC13149775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.