ArticleScientific reports2026
Improving movie rating prediction accuracy and interpretability with narrative-aligned multimodal fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Asynchronous Cross-Modal Dynamic Graph Learning for Intelligent Sensing of AI Computing Infrastructure Expansion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and interpretable movie rating prediction remains challenging. Many existing models make only partial use of narrative text, treat heterogeneous ratings with simple noise assumptions, and offer limited insight into their internal decisions. To address these issues, this paper proposes the Narrative-Aligned Multimodal Rating Network (NAMRN), a model that jointly exploits plot descriptions and structured movie attributes while explicitly modeling sample-wise uncertainty. NAMRN consists of three main components. A narrative-aligned contrastive pretraining module learns plot-level representations that are closely tied to rating signals. An uncertainty-aware heteroscedastic regression module predicts both the mean rating and its variance, so that samples with different confidence levels are treated differently in the loss. A sparse-gated multimodal fusion module adaptively selects informative features from textual and structured channels, which reduces redundancy and highlights the most relevant attributes. All components are compatible with gradient-based interpretability methods, which allows detailed inspection of token-level and feature-level contributions. Experiments on three public movie datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of NAMRN. On The Movies Dataset, NAMRN achieves an MAE of 0.124, an RMSE of 0.170, and an [Formula: see text] of 0.81, outperforming support vector regression, gradient boosting, LSTM-based models, and Transformer-based baselines. Ablation studies confirm that removing any of the three core modules leads to consistent performance degradation. Cross-dataset evaluation on IMDb and MovieLens further shows that the model maintains stable error levels under different rating scales and data distributions. Interpretability analysis based on gradient heatmaps reveals that NAMRN focuses on meaningful narrative cues and structured attributes that are consistent with human judgement. Overall, NAMRN provides a unified solution that improves accuracy, robustness, and transparency in movie rating prediction. The proposed design also offers a flexible foundation for future extensions to multi-criteria evaluation, additional modalities, and fairness-aware recommendation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.