Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876612›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning-based quantitative CT assessment of interstitial lung abnormalities: prognostic risk thresholds in a health screening population.

Jong Eun Lee, Young Ju Suh, Kyubin Kim, Yun-Hyeon Kim, Yeon Joo Jeong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jong Eun Lee *Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8754-6801
Young Ju Suh *Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6816-8067
Kyubin KimDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2648-6530
Yun-Hyeon KimDepartment of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-0729
Yeon Joo JeongDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, 179 Gudeok-ro, Busan, 49241, Korea. jeongyj0610@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-9604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative risk thresholds for interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and their association with long-term outcomes remain unclear in health screening populations. In this retrospective study, individuals aged ≥ 50 years who underwent chest CT between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed. Baseline CT scans were independently reviewed by two chest radiologists and categorized as none, equivocal ILA, or ILA, with consensus adjudication. ILA extent was quantified using a deep learning–based approach, including total ILA% and fibrotic ILA% across the whole lung. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between ILA extent and clinical outcomes, including interstitial lung disease diagnosis, lung cancer diagnosis, and all-cause mortality. Optimal thresholds were determined using the minimum P-value method. Among 3,363 participants, 73 (2.2%) had ILA and 124 (3.7%) had equivocal ILA. The optimal cutoffs for all-cause mortality were 2.89% for total ILA and 0.26% for fibrotic ILA. Participants with total ILA ≥ 2.89% (HR, 5.15; P < 0.001) or fibrotic ILA ≥ 0.26% (HR, 2.71; P < 0.001) had significantly higher mortality risks compared with those below these thresholds. Deep learning–based quantitative ILA assessment was independently associated with long-term mortality, with prognostic thresholds of 3% for total ILA and 0.3% for fibrotic ILA in a health screening population.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLungLung Diseases, InterstitialTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentArtificial IntelligenceInterstitial lung abnormalitiesLong Term Adverse EffectsQuantitative Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41876612
PMCPMC13168490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.