ArticleScientific reports2026
Understanding tens of thousands of pockmarks and domes using machine learning (Gulf of Lions, NW Mediterranean Sea).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A broad spectrum of seabed deformation structures, including pockmarks and domes, related to various processes, have been observed on continental margins worldwide. This study provides the first regional-scale inventory and quantitative characterization of pockmarks and domes potentially linked to subsurface fluid-escape processes on the continental shelf and upper slope in the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). Using high-resolution multibeam bathymetry and seismic reflection data, approximately 29,000 pockmarks and domes were identified. Morphometric and seismic analyses reveal distinct groups that differ in size, shape, and spatial organization. Among them a widespread population of domes rooted on the Holocene maximum flooding surface, which represent ~ 85% of the occurrences. The remaining 15% are pockmarks, divided into five main subtypes. Spatial association of domes and pockmarks suggests a genetic relationship between dome formation and subsequent collapse (pockmarks). Machine learning-based spatial modeling extends the estimated total to ~ 80,000 between 10 and 1000 m water depth, including zones not covered by swath-bathymetric surveys. Among various controlling factors, sediment thickness, water depth, and grain-size variability exert primary controls on the distribution of pockmarks and domes. These results demonstrate that seabed deformations in the Gulf of Lions are spatially organized, reflecting the interplay between fluid-related processes, stratigraphic architecture, and sediment properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.